In academic publishing, the goal of peer review is to assess the quality of articles submitted for publication in a scholarly journal. Peer-reviewed articles undergo the following process:
Because a peer-reviewed journal will not publish articles that fail to meet the standards established for a given discipline, peer-reviewed articles that are accepted for publication exemplify the best research practices in a field.
Adapted from Lloyd Sealy Library's Evaluating Information Sources

The scientific method will form the basis of the research you will be conducting throughout your Summer Research Experience. You are likely already familiar with the steps from previous science courses you have taken!

Before you learn about evidence-based practice, it's best to review how to identify quality sources. This page offers a variety of resources to help you develop a better understanding of the principles behind the development and synthesis of scientific evidence.
You will want to seek out scholarly resources that are reliable and written by authors who have expertise on the subject matter.

Ideally, you should be prioritizing information from primary and secondary sources when conducting research.

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is made up of three major domains: scientific evidence, clinical experience, and patient values.
Scientific Evidence:
Clinical Experience:
Patient Values:

5 Steps of Evidence-Based Practice
There are five distinct processes that take place within evidence-based practice. This LibGuide can serve as a resource for you as you explore the "Ask" and "Acquire" stages.